America's most faithful left-wing journalist strikes again - and President Trump is hitting back at her hard.

CNN's 33-year-old Pentagon correspondent Natasha Bertrand, who's made a name for herself among conservatives as a despised shill for neocon forces in Washington DC for years, dropped her own bomb Tuesday when she reported that the US strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites were basically a dud.

They 'did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by seven people briefed on it,' wrote Bertrand who also appeared on air to discuss her findings.

Bertrand is also known for ginning up the infamous Steele Dossier and authored the notorious October 2020 Politico report stating that the Hunter Biden laptop was 'Russian disinformation' which included mention of the 50 'former senior intelligence officials' who agreed with her claim.

Trump erupted in a fury on his Truth Social account Wednesday afternoon.

'Natasha Bertrand should be FIRED from CNN!' Trump wrote.

'I watched her for three days doing Fake News. She should be IMMEDIATELY reprimanded, and then thrown out 'like a dog.' 

'She lied on the Laptop from Hell Story, and now she lied on the Nuclear Sites Story, attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad when, in fact, they did a GREAT job and hit 'pay dirt' — TOTAL OBLITERATION! 

'She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN. It's people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network. Her slant was so obviously negative, besides, she doesn't have what it takes to be an on camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!'

Earlier White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt took her own potshot at Bertrand's claims.

'This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community,' she said in a statement.

'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.'

For some, it was deja vu all over again. Bertrand, a Vassar College graduate, has come under fire since almost the start of her career in 2014 when she joined Business Insider as an intern.

'Natasha Bertrand did such a great job of lying and spreading disinformation about the Hunter Biden laptop that CNN promoted her,' conservative pundit Maze wrote on X Wednesday.

'Natasha has been really busy this week pushing false narratives so she should be getting a promotion to CNN Chief Propagandist in no time.'

'Guys, if Natasha 'Fusion GPS' Bertrand is being fed a low-confidence intel report by Intel operatives, go ahead and ignore it,' wrote Mollie Hemingway, editor in chief of The Federalist Wednesday.

Back in February 2020, Erik Wemple at the Washington Post slammed Bertrand for writing about the infamous Steele Dossier while still at Business Insider and continuing what he characterized as chronically dubious reporting about alleged Russian interference as she climbed the media ladder.

Wemple said Bertrand had used her Swiss-cheese filled reporting about the Steele dossier to 'bootstrap' herself into a gig as an MSNBC pundit after joining The Atlantic as a staff writer in 2018.

'With winks and nods from MSNBC hosts, Bertrand heaped credibility on the dossier — which was published in full by BuzzFeed News in January 2017 — in repeated television appearances,' Wemple wrote.

'Her written work has appeared on Business Insider, the Atlantic and Politico, where she is now a national security reporter. Along the way, she bootstrapped her punditry into a contributor's role on MSNBC.'

Bertrand became a national security reporter for Politico in 2019, covering US intelligence and the Trump impeachment inquiry against Trump.

Her arrival at CNN in April 2021 as a national security and Pentagon correspondent was not met by enthusiasm in some quarters. Journalist Glenn Greenwald has complained her being a mouthpiece for the Pentagon for more than three years — as have many others.

'Arguably no single reporter has contributed more to the deranged and paranoid national security fantasies of the center-left than Natasha Bertrand,' National Review writer Luke Thompson wrote on X in April 2021 after CNN hired Bertrand.

'She's an embarrassment to her profession and will, therefore, fit right in at CNN,' Thompson wrote, adding that 'she was one of the progenitors of the 'Russian disinfo' lie about Hunter Biden's laptop, and wrote this article, which is typical of her mealy-mouthed and dishonest craft.'

Complicating Bertrand's latest controversy is that the media so far has only Leavitt's insistence that the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated,' or people like Bertrand claiming that they weren't at all.

A possibly better sourced and detailed story was published Wednesday by veteran reporter Seymour Hersh who was one of the few if only to report last Friday that the US would bomb Iran's nuclear sites.

Hersh's story titled 'The Burial Plan' cited intelligence sources telling him that US-Israeli forces deliberately went with a plan to bury and seal off the sites so nobody could get to them - meaning the enriched uranium is still there but no longer possible to get to under the rubble.

CNN swiftly fired back with a strong defense of Bertrand.

'CNN stands 100% behind Natasha Bertrand's journalism and specifically her and her colleagues' reporting of the early intelligence assessment of the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities,' a spokesperson told The Hill.

'CNN's reporting made clear that this was an initial finding that could change with additional intelligence. We have extensively covered President Trump's own deep skepticism about it.'

'However, we do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.'

Bertrand did not return an email from the Daily Mail requesting comment.