She's no stranger to the acting world, having starred in the hit US series' Empire and American Horror Story.
But Naomi Campbell has joined forces with an unlikely name to make a surprise appearance in her ambitious feature-length film.
The supermodel, 54, has collaborated with Miley Cyrus for the singer's ambitious 'one-of-a-kind pop opera', which will hit cinemas in June, following the release of her much-anticipated ninth album Something Beautiful on May 30.
In the trailer, Naomi can be seen strutting towards the camera and later in another dark shot, while Miley herself is seen writhing on the Hollywood Walk Of Fame.
The preview features a string of different vignettes, with Miley seen walking through the streets of Los Angeles, posing inside a studio stage, and sharing a kiss with a mystery lover.
The clip ends with Miley declaring: 'If I break away any bodies between us, would you promise I’m enough? If I give you all my love?'


Sources have told The Sun that Miley spent 'millions' on the top-secret film, and her passion for music has been 'revitalised' ahead of her new album.
A source said: 'This is Miley's most ambitious project ever and it has cost an absolute fortune to make.
'Her label Columbia see her as one of the biggest superstars of our time and after the success of Flowers in 2023, they have given her everything she wanted to make this film a real spectacle.
'They managed to keep shooting on the project under wraps but it has been a really long time in the making.'
Miley's last album, Endless Summer Vacation was released in March 2023 and contained the massive hit Flowers.
Flowers spent eight weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 and broke numerous streaming records.
Flowers won the Grammy last year for record of the year and best pop solo performance, while the album was nominated for album of the year and best pop vocal album.
The star first took to Instagram on Monday to reveal that her long-awaited ninth album would be released in May, posting the cover which showed her dress in dramatic 1997 look from Thierry Mugler.





Beyond modelling, Naomi is a philanthropist and activist.
She founded Fashion For Relief in 2005, aiming to raise funds for humanitarian causes by staging runway shows.
However, Naomi was disqualified from being a charity trustee for five years after a watchdog found serious mismanagement of funds at Fashion for Relief, which she founded.
This included using charity funds to pay for her stay at a five-star hotel in Cannes, France, as well as spa treatments, room service and cigarettes.
She was one of three of the charity's trustees to be disqualified as a result of the probe by the Charity Commission, which regulates charities in England and Wales.
At the time, she said she was 'extremely concerned' by the regulator's findings, adding that she was 'not in control of my charity' having 'put the control in the hands of a lawyer'.
A probe into Fashion for Relief was opened by the commission in 2021, with the charity dissolved and removed from the register of charities last year.
It had been set up with the aim of uniting the fashion industry to relieve poverty and advance health and education, by making grants to other organisations and giving resources towards global disasters.
It hosted fundraising events to generate income, including in Cannes and London.
The regulator's inquiry found that, between April 2016 and July 2022, 8.5% of the charity's overall expenditure was on charitable grants.
The probe saw no evidence that trustees took action to ensure fundraising methods were in the charity's best interests, or that the money it spent was reasonable relative to the income it generated.
It also said it found some fundraising expenditure to be misconduct or mismanagement by the charity's trustees.
This included a 14,800 euro (£12,300) flight from London to Nice for transferring art and jewellery to a fundraising event in Cannes in 2018.
It also looked into the decision to spend 9,400 euros (£7,800) of charity funds on a three-night stay at a five-star hotel for Naomi.
Last year the supermodel said she failed in her duties as a trustee and 'may not have been as actively engaged in the charity's day-to-day operations as she should have been'.
But she maintained she had not engaged in any financial misconduct or misused the charity during its tumultuous nine years.