Rumblings from the murky world of private credit are becoming more ominous by the day.
Blue Owl Capital, a private credit investment firm, has been hit by demands from investors to pull out $5.4billion (£4billion) from two of its main funds in the past quarter.
It is an indicator of how confidence is draining from this large, opaque and thinly regulated market.
Investors elsewhere, including those in funds at Blackstone, Apollo and Cliffwater, have also been jostling for an exit.
The Bank of England warned earlier this week that the US war with Iran may
exacerbate the risks in private credit and other pre-existing fault lines in the financial system.
The now-vast private credit sector sprouted up after the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, filling a vacuum created when regulators curbed riskier lending by the conventional banks.
It fuelled the boom in private equity, providing funds for highly leveraged deals.
At the heart of today’s unease is the question of how vulnerable the mainstream financial system is to a private credit disaster. The consensus view among the experts is the direct jeopardy of the banks is limited.
The big worry is insurance firms, some of which are enmeshed in a symbiotic relationship with private credit.
So much so that the US Treasury is scheduling meetings with domestic and overseas insurance regulators to assess the situation.
Life insurance companies are not prone to bank-style runs by policyholders who are locked in for long terms, but there is a risk they may not be setting aside enough capital to cover any losses.
Some of the insurers with hefty exposures, such as Athene and Global Atlantic, are affiliated with big players in private credit, in these cases Apollo and KKR respectively.
We may not be looking at a 2008-style meltdown as some fear – nevertheless, hold tight.
Unhappy anniversary of the Taco trade
A year ago this week Donald Trump stood in the Rose Garden of the White House, accused other nations of having ‘looted’ the US, and unleashed a barrage of senseless tariffs on the world.
‘Liberation Day’, which was meant to protect American jobs and industry against cheap imports, hasn’t gone as he hoped.
A drop in imports from China into the US has been offset by a big increase in those from other markets such as Taiwan and Vietnam, according to The Economist.
US importers, the ones who actually pay the tariffs, sued the government and won, though Trump is now looking for other routes to pursue his protectionist mission.
This time last year, the outlook seemed frightening enough, but little did we know what was to come.
A backlash on the stock and bond markets following Liberation Day popularised the concept of the Taco trade, standing for ‘Trump always chickens out’. He cannot, however, easily extricate himself from war in Iran.
The free world spent more than 80 years building an international economic order. It has taken just one man in the White House a few short months to undermine the foundations.
Give NEETs a chance
When Marks & Spencer opened a food hall on Clapham High Street just a few months ago, middle-class residents like me were delighted at the badge of bourgeois approval.
Ah, the thrill of posh yoghurt and upwardly mobile house prices!
Such concerns were rudely disregarded by the flash mobs of feral youths who have been swarming SW4. Shoppers browsing the aisles for tiramisu hot cross buns had to be locked in M&S for their own safety.
Explanations for these events are rarely simple. The community is socially mixed, which may have played a part.
And to state the obvious, youngsters who feel they have a promising future are less likely to run amok.
It’s no coincidence these rampages are happening at a time when we have nearly a million NEETs (young people not in education, employment or training).
The numbers have been steadily growing for years, so it’s not all Labour’s fault. But unless Labour deals with it, we will have more impoverished young lives, and more flash mobs.
DIY INVESTING PLATFORMS
Affiliate links: If you take out a product This is Money may earn a commission. These deals are chosen by our editorial team, as we think they are worth highlighting. This does not affect our editorial independence.
Compare the best investing account for you